Architectural USA

vanceintn (January 3rd, 2009 @ 8:03 pm)

right on bro!

vanceintn (January 3rd, 2009 @ 8:01 pm)

yea and this Just happened! Of course with all the fraudulant ACORN and CAIRE votes this Fraud Obama is about to take office and the supreme courts are gonna let him. We've been defeated America, not a shot was fired.

colincky (November 7th, 2008 @ 8:50 am)

why dosent this surprize me. bet the little terrorist BUSH used this.

happosai21 (November 6th, 2008 @ 10:51 am)

well manipulating an election is the whole purpose of a voting computer lol ^^ what do you expect?

Clanmemberkalvin (November 5th, 2008 @ 12:40 am)

lol... It's not surprising that this video has less than 20,000 views... Ah.. we just continue sleeping... We're going to wake up in a world we don't wanna be in.

GrandGuignologist (November 3rd, 2008 @ 3:07 am)

First it was decided in the Supreme Court because the Dems sued. 2 they approved the machines only because they already knew they could hack it.

connoisseurodg (November 2nd, 2008 @ 6:59 am)

The company he worked for (Yang Enterprise Inc.) has already said his claims were untrue BUT refused to go on record and refute any claims he made. What that means is: "Unofficially" he is lying. I don't know, if they have nothing to hide - why wouldn't they go on record??? Hmmmm... Well what do I know, I'm just your average gullible American - Ooh! Look! Paris Hilton is on TV! Gotta go!

CoastalFlyFish (October 28th, 2008 @ 9:13 pm)

I'm not american and not familiar with this trial.. Could someone please tell me, what name this dispute might go by? - So I can look further into it on my own.. thanks.

chmorley (October 27th, 2008 @ 5:48 am)

Interesting theory. A couple of problems with it: 1) The recount was never completed (thanks to the Supreme Court); 2) Diebold CEO, Wally O'Dell, a loyal Republican, vowed he "would do anything to ensure President Bush gets re-elected; Again, I still don't understand how in this scenario the conspirators (embodied by Diebold and other Repub-owned vote-counting machine companies) benefit from the conspiracy. What's their motive? It's hard to square this theory with the facts.

GrandGuignologist (October 26th, 2008 @ 4:50 pm)

It was all a fake. The truth is the Dems cryed recount on a very close race. they made a big deal about hanging chads, and even tryed to have the military absentee ballots thrown out. the count still came out Bush. afterward they cryed for reform, and the Diebold was born, Then went on a smear campain. for eight years they did everything in their power to make people hate Bush. even to the point of making a cartoon to humiliate him. they knew the fools would fall right in line. end phase two.

chmorley (October 26th, 2008 @ 2:29 pm)

Interesting theory. How did all of the corporate parties (e.g., Republican-backed Diebold) who have been working on behalf of Republicans and now support McCain decide to work for Obama? And how do the tens of competing pollsters all conspire to show a similar large margin for Obama? Typically in plausible conspiracy theories, the ones with the power rigging the outcome benefit from the fraudulent outcome. Why would they act against their own self-interests?

GrandGuignologist (October 22nd, 2008 @ 11:15 pm)

The news is already suppressing stories that might make their candidate look bad. they falsly report the pole numbers. they will hack electronic voting machines, and obama will win.